WhatsApp Talk with us Nederlands

Voicebot or human? What your callers actually want

We asked on LinkedIn how people prefer to call a company. The answers varied, but one thing became clear: the discussion is more nuanced than "bot yes or no."

46% prefer a human on the line. 38% choose "bot first, human if needed." And 8% simply don't care. That means nearly half of respondents have no objection to a digital assistant, as long as it actually helps them.

What the resistance really says

The scepticism around voicebots rarely has anything to do with the technology itself. It’s about bad experiences with technology that doesn’t work. A bot that doesn’t understand your question. That offers no way out when it gets stuck. That makes you explain the same thing three times.

That’s not an argument against automation. That’s an argument for a better approach.

Recent large-scale research among more than 340 CX professionals worldwide confirms this. Customers are not against technology, they’ve simply become more critical. They want to know what happens to their data, they expect the interaction to make sense, and they notice immediately when a system isn’t tuned to them.

What a well-configured digital assistant does

A voicebot that’s set up properly does exactly what 38% of your callers want: get to the right place, fast. No endless call menus, no going in circles. The assistant understands what someone needs and responds intelligently. It routes to the right department, retrieves customer data in advance, or handles a straightforward question on the spot.

When things get more complex? The digital assistant hands over to an agent, complete with context. No restarting the conversation, no frustration.

The combination is the strength

The 43% who prefer a human on the line have a point. Human contact is valuable, especially in emotional or complex situations. But that value is wasted if agents have to be available for questions a well-configured bot can easily handle.

In practice, this means a digital assistant and an agent complement each other like two links in the same chain. The bot picks up the initial contact, filters and processes what it can, and passes the rest along in a structured way. The agent doesn’t start the conversation from scratch, but exactly where the bot left off, with the right information already available. That makes the conversation shorter, more focused, and more pleasant for the customer. And it gives agents the space to focus on what people actually expect from them: thinking along, reading the room, and looking beyond the standard question.

The strongest customer journey combines both. Technology for speed and scale. People for nuance and empathy. Not as competitors, but as complements.

Customers don’t notice whether they’re talking to a bot or a human. They only notice whether their question was resolved.

Where do you start?

The move toward a digital assistant doesn’t have to be a big leap. Many organisations start with a focused use case. For example, routing to the right department, or retrieving customer data before an agent picks up the call. That delivers immediate results: shorter conversations, less repetition, less pressure on the team.

From there, you build further. Step by step, handling more questions automatically, triggering more processes, until the digital assistant becomes a fully integrated part of your customer journey. Organisations that do this well don’t just see efficiency improve, they see customer satisfaction rise too. Because callers get helped faster. Because agents have more time for the conversations that actually matter.

And the future? It demands even more. Customers are becoming more demanding, not less. They compare their experience with you to the best experience they’ve ever had, with any company. A well-configured digital assistant won’t be a differentiator for much longer. It’ll be a baseline expectation. The organisations investing now in the right combination of technology and human contact will be in a significantly stronger position.